Enterprise AI Framework¶
Why this framework exists¶
Treating model selection as the architecture causes AI adoption to fail. Enterprise outcomes depend on a wider system: legal authority, mission context, data rights, human accountability, semantic grounding, integration boundaries, security controls, operational feedback, and evidence of performance.
The Enterprise Context Architecture (ECA) makes those dependencies explicit and traceable. AI needs authoritative enterprise context.
Explore the framework¶
-
Architecture
Perspectives, layers, context boundaries, capabilities, and integration patterns.
-
Governance
Decision rights, policies, risk tiers, assurance gates, and accountable operation.
-
Delivery
Specification-driven delivery, shifting roles and accountability, team topologies, and a reference implementation.
-
Security
Zero trust, data protection, threat modeling, resilience, and incident response.
-
Compliance
Traceable, non-certifying mappings to widely used frameworks and obligations.
-
Blueprints
Reusable, risk-aware reference designs for common regulated use cases.
Adoption steps¶
- Establish mission outcomes, legal authority, affected parties, and prohibited outcomes.
- Define the system boundary and classify impact and risk.
- Select architecture capabilities and assign accountable owners.
- Tailor governance, security, privacy, and assurance controls.
- Implement with traceable requirements and evidence.
- Evaluate before release and continuously monitor production behavior.
- Record residual risk, authorization decisions, incidents, and lessons learned.
Scope of guidance
Use the framework as architecture guidance. Legal compliance, certification, authorization to operate, and fitness for a particular purpose require separate validation by qualified authorities.
Document lifecycle¶
Content progresses through Draft, Public Review, Candidate, Stable, and Deprecated. Draft material may change without backward compatibility guarantees.